( Ontological Arguments ) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

( Ontological Arguments ) - Essay ExampleThe conceptual analysis of the cause of the foundation based on cosmological line helps in establishing the important facts about the existence of the instauration and its being. The argument starts from three premisesPremise (1) is notably true since something cannot come out of nothing. According to metaphysical intuition in that respect has to be some cause for the existence of something. It is thus very reasonable to argue that in that location is a requirement of a causal explanation for the existence of the universe even for the atheists. This is because if they believe that the universe began at the Bing Bang, then the universe must have had the potentiality to exist in the first place. And since at that place is nothing that had existed prior to the Bing Bang, then the potentiality of the universes existence rested in the personnel of God who made it possible. As such, this premise is true as we can confirm it in our realities and besides the scientist naturalists can sense in it.Premise (2) holds that an actual infinite cannot exist. This is because as infinite temporal infantile fixation of events causes intolerable absurdities and because it cannot exist. History is made of events leading up to each other sequentially and, therefore it is very possible to add to history making its existence potentially infinite. However, it can only be potentially infinite as opposed to being actually infinite.This argument is frequently objected on the reason of the second premise which is deemed problematic both scientifically and philosophically. This is because opponents state that if the universe has an infinitely distant outset point, then one should be able to transverse from the starting point to the present. The common logic is that if there is a finite distance which connects sequential events in the past, then it can be easily transversed, which is not the case here. This objection is further worsened by the fact that the cosmological argument presupposes