Research critique part 2 Essay

Quantitative Research CritiqueThis is a quantitative oeuvre seek critique of the research hit the books conducted by Lisa M Black PhD,RN,CNE, Tragedy into Policy A Quantitative Study of Nurses Attitudes Toward patient of Advocacy Activities. The findings from this research memorize was used in the convey of Nevada to protect nurses when reporting unsafe conditions in patient c are practices, thus providing a safer work environs where nurses can feel safe when speech production out where patient safety is in jeopardy from unsafe business organisation practices. Protection of Human ParticipantsThe benefits of this study were the creation of legal protection for whistleblowers in the state of Nevada. There were no risks to any participants safety for this study. certain consent was not needed as retuning the completed survey was viewed as consent to be included. every last(predicate) participation in the study was viewed as voluntary. Approval of the survey tool was obtained from the University of Nevada, Reno prior to beginning info collection. (Black, 2011, p. 29) Data CollectionThe dependent variables in this study are the registered nurses licensed to practice in the state of Nevada the independent variable was the Registered Nurses Workplace Support for Patient Advocacy Activities Study Questionnaire.(Black, 2011, p. 29) Data was collected by the developed questionnaire that was sent to 1725 registered nurses with active, current licensure and residing in the state of Nevada at the time of the survey.(Black, 2011, p. 29) The author provided no precept for using the chosen data collection method, I would assume that this was the most cost effective and outgo way to maintain privacy for all respondents. The surveys were sent out using the United States Postal go on September 8, 2008.(Black, 2011, p. 30) The respondents were asked to complete the survey by one of two methods, filling out, and returning the topic survey via US postal service or by completing it online. All responses were accepted by dint of October 31, 2008. (Black, 2011, p. 30) After distribution of the questionnaire respondents were given the time period listed September 8, 2008 through October 31, 2008 to respond to the survey every written or online. (Black, 2011, p. 30) Data Management and AnalysisA priori power abridgment was performed and established that a minimum savour of 405 respondents would be required to detect a medium effect size.(Black, 2011, p. 29) In identify to determine if the study sample was demographically representative of nurses in Nevada, the demographic data was compared to the data from the 2004 National try on Survey of Registered Nurses from Nevada. (Black, 2011, p. 29) Reliability testing of the survey tool demonstrated a high degree of cozy consistency. (Black, 2011, p. 30) No statistical software was mentioned in this study.Other than the reliability testing performed, the survey results were calculated with a total of 564 valid responses collected this represented 33% response rate. (Black, 2011, p. 30) Response number varied from concomitant to item as most participants left one or more items blank. (Black, 2011, p. 30) I felt this study was a reliable source of information concerning legislation protecting whistleblowers from body of work retaliation. According to the priori power analysis the minimum sample necessary of 405 respondents was required with 564 valid responses received the minimum sample size was met. (Black, 2011, p. 29)The limitations that are identified in this study were, the sample size was considered to be small, even with the randomly chosen sample there was a potential response bias, and due to the nurses who have negative work environments may be more likely to complete the questionnaire than those with a more positive one. (Black, 2011, p. 33) This created the potential for inflated representation of the frequence and severity of these experiences. (Black, 2011, p. 33) This is the reason for caution when applying the findings to nurses outside of this study. (Black, 2011, p. 33) The survey tool did not allow for antitheticaliation of different types of unsafe situations or different levels of retaliation. (Black, 2011, p. 34) Interpretation of survey questions may vary from one respondent to another.(Black, 2011, p. 34) This research study was presented in a logical easily understood manner with explanation and definition of findings and limitations. The findings of this study to were used in the creation of a law protecting nurses reporting unsafe patient care practices in acute care facilities and free standing offices and clinics in Nevada. The creation of this legislation helps create an environment for nurses to carry out their moral imperative to prevent harm to patients whenever possible and to report potential or actual causes of harm to protect patients.(Black, 2011, p. 35) There were no suggestions for future research. There was su ggestion for changes in workplace environments encouraging openness in communication and especially in cases where patient safety is a concern. (Black, 2011, p. 35)